🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.